Thursday, January 12, 2012

13. RANSOM: Third section






Structurally, Section III is the dramatic centre of the novel, yet it is also the ‘quietest’
most serene section of the narrative. Priam and Somax journey to the camp of
Achilles, a journey that might have been expected to present great challenges or
obstacles to be overcome in epic fashion. In keeping, however, with Priam’s original
vision the journey is described as an entirely ordinary affair, leading Priam to ponder
on the nature of ordinary reality. This section is notable also for the role that Somax
plays as a story-teller of the most ordinary, even mundane realties as with his
description of the making of the griddle cakes which becomes almost allegorical in its
evocation of humble work and the sustaining pleasures of honest labour. As Somax
tells the story of how the pikelets came to be made, Priam is transported into the
world of his subjects, a universe he appears to have very little acquaintance with.
The details of this story come to be seen as completely in keeping with Priam’s
vision of approaching Achilles, not as a king, but as a father. Somax’s story
expresses his own pride and pleasure in the work of his daughter-in-law who is
sketched in language akin to that of a still life portrait:

‘It’s a real pleasure to watch the batter bubbling and setting and turning a golden
brown, as you can see, around the edges. The lightness comes from the way the
cook flips them over. Very neat and quick you have to be. The daughter-in-law, she’s
a good girl, uses her fingers — it’s a trick you have to learn — and if she happens to
burn them she pops her fingers into her mouth ...’. (p.119)

Priam listens intently to this story as it transports him into another sphere, the sphere
of ordinary experience, a world fundamentally different to the one he usually inhabits.
The details of ordinary life come before him as so many reminders of what it is to be
human, water, fish, birds and insects: ‘They were not in the royal sphere. Being
unnecessary to royal observance or feeling, they were in the background, and his
attention was fixed always on what was central. Himself’. (p.122) The formality of his
royal identity is what Priam watches melt away, the ‘world of ceremony’, as he listens
first to Somax/Idaeus recount the details of common experience; then, more
dramatically when he hears of the death of Somax’s two sons, which constitutes an
important narrative counter weight to the story of Hector’s death and the mission
they are on to retrieve his body. The stories Somax tells of his own family have
nothing of the epic quality of the siege of Troy that afflicts the Royal House of Priam,
but the details he evokes of injured children conveys a simple colloquial power that
entrances Priam. Somax speaks in a colloquial voice that examines the nature of
filial and paternal bonds, the very heart of Priam’s quest. Somax explains that when
he left that morning his daughter was running a fever:

To tell the truth, sir, just at the moment she’s a worry to me. If I’ve been a bit absent
at times, and wrapped up in my own thoughts, it’s because I’ve been thinking of her,
poor soul, as you do, sir, when they are all that’s left of your own blood’. (p.130)
Somax/Idaeus expresses the very human qualities of filial devotion, pain,
compassion, selflessness and care which have consumed Priam, who, up until this
moment has struggled to find an opportunity to express them himself. This story of
the sick daughter gives way to more haunting memories of the death of sons, ghosts
of the past that continue to torment Somax and force their way into stories. The
chronicles Somax describes about the deaths of his sons, is contrasted with the epic
scale of the death of Hector. However, these are presented as equally affecting for
the narrator telling the story. Whether it is the death of a hero on the plains of battle
or in the mud attempting to free a cart the shared feeing is one of profound sadness
and regret, of inconsolable longing that is the abiding legacy of a father who has had
to bury his son. Somax speaks in a language that deeply affects his listener,
confirming the justice of his vision and the rightness of the mission he has embarked
upon. Yet Priam also comes to understand that the nature of Somax’s connection to
his sons is one of a ‘violent intimacy’ that he has never known:
‘Did he regret these human occasions, and the memory of them that might have
twined his sons more deeply into his affections and made his relationship with them
more warm and particular?’ (p.138)

For the remainder of their journey Priam and Somax are joined by a mysterious
guide who appears suddenly in the guise of a Greek soldier but is unmistakably a
god, Hermes, sent to guide them to the camp. They pass through a region that has
been transformed: ‘The landscape they were entering was one of utter devastation’.
(p.155) Just prior to entering the Greek camp Priam experiences a moment of almost
divine inspiration when he realises that the young god has been addressing him as
father:

‘Now with the play about to begin in which he was to represent ‘the father’ — and in
a way he had never until now attempted — he was moved by the invocation of the
sacred tie, and took it, from a god’s lips, as an endorsement and blessing’. (p.161)
This endorsement foreshadows the climactic encounter with Achilles and focuses
what has been the principal dramatic concern of Section III.

12. RANSOM: Second section

































In counter balance to Achilles, Malouf introduces Priam, King of Troy, who has
witnessed the death and desecration of his son, Hector. Priam is a character who is
also consumed with grief, Hector being one of many sons he has lost in the war with
the Greeks. Priam is initially portrayed as a character who embodies the city, as the
king he is Troy itself, its personification. Hector’s death provokes in Priam
apocalyptic dreams of the destruction of the city: ‘The grief that racks him is not only
for his son Hector. It is also for a kingdom ravaged and threatened with extinction...’.
(p.40) Priam is subject to haunting visions of the destruction of his city and its
people; acutely sensitive to his own role as the sacred embodiment of their history
and culture, his status is that of a ceremonial figure, more than a man, he is
effectively confined within the ceremonial function of his title and, therefore,
experiences a dislocation from the world of human particulars, including his own
family. At one point Priam confesses to uncertainty as to the exact number of
Princes, his own sons.

Priam has a vision in which he converses with the goddess Iris who suggests to him
that his fate is not merely to be a puppet of the gods and that as a man he can affect
his own destiny by recognising the powers of chance — a blasphemous suggestion,
but one that gradually liberates Priam’s conception of himself. In this vision Priam is
transformed, no longer the embodiment of the grandeur of Troy, but simply a man,
seated on a cart, beside a driver, with the collected treasures of Troy behind them.
Priam understands instantly, instinctively what this vision means and what he must
do. The symbolism of the ransom touches something deep within him, as we later
learn from Priam himself; both his name and his fate are the result of a much earlier
ransom.

Priam informs his wife, Hecuba, of his vision and his consequent decision to travel to
the camp of Achilles to seek the ransom of their dead son’s body. Hecuba too is
portrayed as a figure consumed with grief as she gives voice to the atrocities she
has witnessed in war. Hecuba expresses a mother’s suffering as she must
remember the experience of childbirth while her dead son lies mutilated on the plains
outside the city walls. Malouf develops the dramatic contrast between war and
creation, the maternal instincts of Hecuba and the illogical destructiveness of war.
Hecuba’s memories of carrying her unborn children are removed from Priam’s own
recollections of his children which are uncertain and ill defined. Hecuba’s particular
recollections anticipate those of Somax when he recalls the deaths of his own sons
in all their specific detail and vividness.

Hecuba is frightened by Priam’s plan to ransom their son’s body and, in an attempt
to assuage her fears, Priam recounts his own narrative of chance and redemptive
transformation: ‘You know my story ... You must have heard it a hundred times as a
child in your father’s palace’. (p.63) Priam then tells the story of Podarces, son of
Laomedon, King of Troy. As a child Priam/Podarces witnessed the earlier siege of
Troy and the death of his father. The child prince hides among a group of beggar
children who will be enslaved by the city’s conquerors; in yet another instance in the
novel of the dualities of self and of the transformation into otherness, the prince
becomes a beggar. The story of Podarces incarnates the theme of chance as he
only narrowly escapes the fate of spending the rest of his life as a slave by the
chance reunion with his sister Hesione who has been promised her ‘choice’ by
Heracles, conqueror of Troy. When she chooses her brother, Heracles renames him
Priam: ‘ … the price paid, the gift given to buy your brother back from the dead. So
that each time he hears himself named, this is what he will recall ... And in the
secrecy of his own heart, that, for all the high titles the gods may heap upon him, is
the life he will go on living day after day till his last breath’. (p.74)

It is not only being renamed that affects Priam so profoundly but another sensation
that evokes the importance of story: ‘I had experienced something I could not unexperience and would never forget. What it means for your breath to be in another’s mouth, to be one of those who have no story that will ever be told’. (p.75) Thespectre of enslavement is not the worst fate that threatened the child Podarces, but to have become one of those numberless masses who are denied the consolation of having their individual stories known. If the victors write the narrative of history, Priam has experienced the fate of the losers, to be erased from the narrative, to have become anonymous, forgotten. The symbolism of the ransom becomes central to the narrative as the ransom allows Priam to transform himself for a second time in his life — on this occasion, to transcend the trappings of his royal ceremonial self, a role that has become something of an emptiness: ‘Only I know what it costs to be
such an object. To rattle about like a pea in the golden husk of my ... dazzling
eminence’. (p.78)

The response to Priam’s plan among the members of the Trojan court, his remaining
sons and daughters, is to attempt to dissuade their father from venturing on such a
dangerous mission. Malouf depicts the social divisions within the court as the effects
of a decade of war. Helenus, Cassandra, Deiphobus, Polydorus and Priam’s other
children represent a divided family who give expression to their own dislocations
within the larger culture of the city, but also their distance from the king himself. This
lack of intimacy is expressed through their inability to understand what is motivating
their father, his profound need to transcend his own role as king and act as a father:
‘You ask me to stand, as I have always done, at a kingly distance from the human,
which in my kingly role, as you say, I can have no part in. But I am also a father.
Mightn’t it be time for me to expose myself at last to what is merely human?’. (p.85)
Priam explains to the assembled court why he feels so profoundly impelled to move
beyond his sacred and ceremonial role, to enter the terrain of the merely human as
the necessary act of a father and how strongly this is tied up with his own feelings of
mortality, this quality which distinguishes human experience and consciousness.
Finally, it is Priam’s account of how deeply felt is his need to experience this
consciousness of his own mortality and identity that silences the objections of the
court. Arrangements are then made to satisfy Priam’s wishes, at first unsuccessfully
when the king is presented with transportation befitting his royal status, not the
simple mode he requested. After Priam’s angry rejection of a royal chariot this
mistake is quickly corrected; and the carter Somax with his two mules, Beauty and
Shock, is enlisted to accompany the king to the camp of the Greeks. Before the end
of this section there is another important moment of transformation in which the
humble carter Somax is transformed into the King’s herald Idaeus.

11. RANSOM: WAR and the TREATMENT of the DEAD


In The Iliad Homer describes Archilles' behaviour after he has killed Hector in one-on-one battle: he ties a rope around Hector's feet and then drags his dead body through the dirt, around and around the city of Troy. It is an act of desecration. Hecuba, Priam's wife and Hector's mother, describes Achilles as a jackal; she, like the other citizens of Troy, are appalled by Achilles' barbarous act.
In Ransom, Malouf also recreates the scene. The scene is pivotal to the plot of the novel; it is what prompts Priam to undertake something no man had undertaken before.

Today's newspapers and current affairs programs are full of commentary on a recent atrocity in Afghanistan involving US troops. Here is an examples:


US marines video sparks criminal investigation

Lisa Millar reported this story on Friday, January 13, 2012
Listen to MP3 of this story ( minutes)
Alternate WMA version MP3 download
A video allegedly showing US marine soldiers urinating on dead Taliban fighters has sparked a criminal investigation. It's been condemned by US officials who are concerned it could lead to a backlash in Afghanistan against its troops.

EMILY BOURKE: A criminal investigation has been launched into a video apparently showing American marines urinating on dead Taliban fighters. US officials including Hillary Clinton have condemned it as disgusting, deplorable and against American values. The US is concerned it could spark a backlash in Afghanistan against its troops and damage early attempts at brokering talks between the Taliban and other warring parties. North America correspondent Lisa Millar reports.
LISA MILLAR: The footage is brief, its ramifications unknown. The camera moves into place while four men in marine uniforms stand urinating on three dead bodies.(Sounds from video)Whoever who posted it on the internet included details of the sniper team and its battalion.The military is checking its authenticity but the reaction from senior officials like Hillary Clinton appears to confirm there's little doubt.
HILLARY CLINTON: Condemning the deplorable behaviour that is reflected in this video. It is absolutely inconsistent with American values, with the standards of behaviour that we expect from our military personnel and that the vast, vast majority of our military personnel particularly our marines hold themselves to.
LISA MILLAR: Several investigations are already underway.
HILLARY CLINTON: Anyone, anyone found to have participated or known about it, having engaged in such conduct, must be held fully accountable.
LISA MILLAR: From Afghanistan there was reaction on behalf of the international forces from General Adrian Bradshaw.
ADRIAN BRADSHAW: These actions do not represent the values of the vast majority of coalition forces who serve their nations honourably. Such behaviour betrays the core values of every service member here representing 50 nations of this coalition.
LISA MILLAR: While it raises questions about training and supervision the video could also impact on early attempts for reconciliation with the Taliban.While that policy has its critics the White House spokesman Jay Carney says there has to be a political solution in Afghanistan at some point.
JAY CARNEY: But it is, it is, coexists with our military campaign. It is in fact our military campaign that has set the conditions for initial reconciliation discussions that we hope will begin taking place.
LISA MILLAR: The Taliban is quoted as saying the video won't impact on planned peace talks because they were at such an early stage. The US says those talks needs to be driven by the Afghan government.
ILLARY CLINTON: I think all of us are entering into it with a very realistic sense of what is possible. And that includes of course president Karzai and his government which after all bear the ultimate responsibility and the consequences of any such discussions.
LISA MILLAR: A senior US diplomat is due in the region this weekend for more talks with Hamid Karzai. This video is unlikely to help any of those discussions. This is Lisa Millar in Washington for AM.

ADDITIONAL LINKS

Video shows US marines urinating on dead bodies in Afghanistan - PM 12.01.12
NATO stops Afghan prisoner transfers over torture, ABC News, 07.09.2011
On patrol in Helmand province, 7.30, 06.06.2011
Waterboarding helped find bin Laden: CIA chief, ABC News, 04.05.2011
US to deploy extra 1,400 marines to Afghanistan, ABC News, 07.01.2011
New Abu Ghraib photographs send shockwaves through Arab world, PM, 16.02.2006
Two prisoners dead in custody in Afghanistan: Pentagon, The World Today, 15.12.2004

Thursday, January 5, 2012

10. And YET ANOTHER special post: The GAP RESOURCE



The GAP Resource







Sometimes, persuading people to do what we want is just a matter of being cute. But at other times, PERSUADING people is hard work. Not only that, we are bombarded by the attempts of others to PERSUADE us: buy this, join me in this campaign, do this, don't do that.



The GAP Resource is aimed at helping you with the USING LANGUAGE TO PERSUADE secttion of the VCE English course. This page will contain a detailed list of the contents of the blog. To access the blog, click on the link below:










9. VERY SPECIAL POSTING: LINK to the GPS

Like the freeway, like the World Wide Web, our brains carry lots of traffic... lots of BITS [or bytes] of information. It's very hard to keep track of everything that's going on.




When we're driving, it helps to have a good Melways, a good roadmap - or even a GPS. It's the same with writing. With so much traffic - so many bytes of information - running through our minds, it's easy to get confused. That's why I've added this LINK. This link takes you to my GPS site for writing.



G = GRAMMAR





P = PUNCTUATION





S = SPELLING




Sometimes, when I'm giving you feedback, I will refer you to a particular posting on the GPS. Please make use of this LINK on those occasions - or just browse around and learn a bit more about English grammar, punctuation and spelling.






CONTENTS



14. More on Sentence Fragments
13. Sentence fragments
12. And some more on TAUTOLOGY
11. Tautologies: Try your hand at spotting them
10. A Dead Corpse Watches a Soccer Game…
9. Proper Nouns
8. The half brothers of punctuation: colon and sem...
7. It's rather, somewhat, quite ... cluttered
6. If ... Subjunctive Mood in English
5. Metaphor: Spice Girls explode onto the stage
4. SPELLING MATTERS
3. WRITING - DOs and DON'Ts
2. Spelling Demons: ITS and IT'S
1. Welcome to the GPS




Monday, January 2, 2012

8. Whose Reality? A video introduction





This clip presents some key philosophical ideas about the attempts that humans have made to understand the notion of reality.



Don't worry if it doesn't make complete sense to you at the beginning. Watch it, make notes, ask question, think about the two approaches to reality that it presents.



Saturday, December 31, 2011

7. Sample SAC questions for RANSOM


Elyse asked if I could give some examples of the kinds of questions that might be set in a SAC on Ransom. Here are SIX sample questions.


1. "Priam's journey to Achilles' camp provides a ransom for himself as well as for Hector."
Explain how Priam is changed by his experiences and why this occurs.


2. "I came also as a hero of the deed that till now was never attempted."
Discuss the significance of 'chance' in Ransom.



3. How is narrative point of view used in the novel to give the reader a range of perspectives on the idea of the hero?


4. "We're children of nature, my lord. Of earth, as well as of the gods."
Is Somax's view of humanity and nature important in Ransom?


5. In Ransom Malouf shows that universal experiences of fatherhood and humanity unite even bitter enemies. Discuss.

6. In the final pages of Ransom, Malouf writes of Somax: ‘This old fellow, like other story tellers, is a stealer of other men’s tales, of other men’s lives.’
Discuss this idea in relation to Ransom.